Also, their roadmap, in terms of mhz, is much more aggressive than that of Sun’s. What is very strange is that Fujitsu, which also has based their CPU’s on Sparc, is running at equivalent speeds to PowerPC and Itanium. Considering they all plan to release newer faster chips this year, Sun seems quite a bit behind. IBM, Intel, and AMD are all already running at around 1.5 ghz. We’ll be seeing > 2GHz SPARC systems within a year, and with dramatically reduced heat dissipation (a 900MHz UltraSPARC III Cu currently runs ~70C)Īnyone else notice that Sun’s UltraSparc IV chip seems to be a bit on the slow side? I know bandwidth and all those other things are important too, but it seems that Sun is the only company coming out with 1.05 and 1.2 ghz cpu’s. Sun will then also offer systems based on Fujitsu’s SPARC64 processors. This will be remedied when Sun starts using Fujitsu for fabrication. 13 micron process even after most other vendors have moved to or are in the process of moving to. 13 micron process being utilized by TI, Sun’s current fabrication contractor. Sun’s clock speed problems are due to the relatively antequated. The SunFire V20z, an Opteron powered server:Īnyone else notice that Sun’s UltraSparc IV chip seems to be a bit on the slow side? I know bandwidth and all those other things are important too, but it seems that Sun is the only company coming out with 1.05 and 1.2 ghz cpu’s.Ĭare to show me another vendor offering a 72-way system with support for 144 hardware threads? The Altix comes to mind, but application support for Linux/IA64 at this point it time is sparse at best. But trust me on this, the prime objective of Scott McNealy is destroying Microsoft, the second keeping his company alive (by creating products of good quality) It’s a cool company, nice working atmosphere. I was working for Sun Microsystems for a couple of years. That this helps to promote Linux “is just an unintentional side-effect” ? The same goes for all the other open-source projects Sun is involved in. OpenOffice is not meant to “help” Linux, it’s supposed to “damage” Microsoft. are nice open-source projects by Sun, and they all work on different operating system (Solaris, Linux, *BSD, Windows, …). That wouldn’t really increase their market share. Sun is not interested in supporting Linux on SPARC (they have their own Unix), nor putting in enterprise experience into the Linux or *BSD operation systems.
Crack allplan 2016 software#
If suddenly the software or its features is available on other, cheaper, but not neccessarily much worse platforms, sales will drop. Other companies like SGI or IBM however try an other approach: they try to incorporate these features into the Linux kernel.īut Sun won’t be going this way, since they depend on selling systems, ie. “Maybe the Linux OS isn’t suitable for Sun’s objectives.” They DO however support various other open-source projects. IMNSHO Sun is a nice company (I actually worked for them), but they don’t give a shit about Linux or any other open-source operating system on SPARC. The same goes for IBM (power processors) and partly for SGI (mips, itanium). HP supports the open-source community and published almots all docu and inner details of these processor families.They actually even employ PA-RISC/Itanium people to develop for the Linux kernel, gcc and various other non-Linux related stuff. Look at the Alpha, PA-RISC and Itanium processors.
The ix86 is very popular, and due to this fact there is lots of knowledge about all variations implementation of this processor architecture.īut popularity is not really neccessary. for a specific processor than anything else. IMHO it is much more important to have a good ducos, errata etc. Sun’s UltraSPARC IIIi are not well supported under OpenBSD (since they still don’t have the NDA documents). Ross HyperSPARC are not very well supported under Linux/*BSD.
The implementation is what matters, and if you don’t have a very well documented processor implementation, an generic “open standard” doesn’t help you much.
Sun’s SPARC impementation, the SPARC64 implementation from Fujitsu, aswell as the old Ross HyperSPARC are propriataty. Competition, and therefore cheaper prices perhaps. Well, SPARC is an open-standard, so what does it give you?Īctually not much.